+245.8%
THC vs ARMK
+114.7%
+131.1%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -0.9% | +1.5% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -2.4% | +1.8% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +1.3% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +64.2% | +6.7% | +57.6% | +60.0% |
| 6M | +8.3% | +38.8% | -30.5% | -4.6% |
| YTD | +33.4% | +55.2% | -21.8% | +12.3% |
| 1Y | +37.7% | +46.6% | -8.9% | +18.3% |
| All | +245.8% | +114.7% | +131.1% | +161.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling