+433.9%
THC vs ARMK
+96.1%
+337.8%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -0.8% | +1.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +2.8% | -2.5% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -1.8% | +10.8% | +9.2% |
| 3M | +12.9% | -10.9% | +23.8% | +16.8% |
| 6M | +52.8% | +21.2% | +31.6% | +41.3% |
| YTD | +47.4% | +47.0% | +0.4% | +26.3% |
| 1Y | +47.7% | +42.9% | +4.9% | +27.8% |
| All | +433.9% | +96.1% | +337.8% | +324.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling