+43.3%
TGT vs FROG
+219.3%
-175.9%
-49.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +0.7% | -3.9% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -4.8% | +1.2% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -0.9% | +5.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +25.4% | +7.5% | +17.9% | +24.7% |
| 6M | +33.4% | +107.0% | -73.6% | +27.1% |
| YTD | +65.6% | +39.8% | +25.8% | +61.4% |
| 1Y | +80.3% | +74.8% | +5.5% | +71.2% |
| All | +43.3% | +219.3% | -175.9% | +20.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling