+104.5%
TFC vs ZETA
+280.9%
-176.4%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -4.1% | +4.1% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +2.4% | +2.7% | -0.2% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +15.8% | -17.1% | -3.2% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +35.4% | -29.4% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +7.3% | +67.1% | -59.8% | -0.6% |
| YTD | +8.2% | +54.1% | -45.9% | +0.7% |
| 1Y | +14.4% | +67.8% | -53.4% | +4.5% |
| All | +104.5% | +280.9% | -176.4% | +40.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling