+59.0%
TFC vs UMAC
+508.0%
-449.0%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -6.4% | +5.6% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +3.3% | -4.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -2.3% | -10.4% | +8.1% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +2.5% | +1.8% | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| 6M | +9.5% | +40.7% | -31.3% | +7.9% |
| YTD | +5.1% | +90.9% | -85.8% | +2.6% |
| 1Y | +15.5% | +151.8% | -136.3% | +11.8% |
| All | +59.0% | +508.0% | -449.0% | +50.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling