+86.2%
TFC vs NIO
-59.9%
+146.0%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +5.9% | -6.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +5.6% | -4.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +8.3% | -4.2% | +12.6% | +8.5% |
| 3M | -5.2% | -26.3% | +21.1% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -0.8% | -42.5% | +41.7% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +3.4% | -33.5% | +37.0% | +4.9% |
| 1Y | +17.0% | -52.7% | +69.7% | +21.5% |
| 3Y | +86.2% | -57.5% | +143.6% | +91.9% |
| All | +86.2% | -59.9% | +146.0% | +91.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling