+96.0%
TFC vs LNG
+85.6%
+10.3%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.2% | +1.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +11.3% | -9.1% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +10.8% | +10.6% | +0.2% | +8.2% |
| 3M | -3.8% | +16.1% | -19.9% | -7.0% |
| 6M | +9.6% | +29.6% | -20.0% | +2.9% |
| YTD | +5.8% | +60.3% | -54.5% | -8.6% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | +46.1% | -29.9% | +3.4% |
| 3Y | +96.0% | +85.9% | +10.0% | +61.1% |
| All | +96.0% | +85.6% | +10.3% | +61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling