+4.9%
TFC vs DOCS
+38.8%
-33.9%
-14.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DOCS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.0% | +6.3% | -3.4% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +1.2% | +3.8% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +9.8% | +21.3% | -11.5% | +9.7% |
| 3M | -2.4% | +58.4% | -60.8% | -2.2% |
| 6M | +4.9% | +39.3% | -34.4% | +5.2% |
| All | +4.9% | +38.8% | -33.9% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOCS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOCS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOCS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOCS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling