+214.8%
TER vs UMC
+227.6%
-12.8%
-34.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -2.5% | -1.0% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +9.4% | +11.4% | -2.0% | +4.2% |
| 30D | -2.4% | +16.8% | -19.2% | -9.2% |
| 3M | +6.5% | +19.1% | -12.6% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +23.2% | +137.4% | -114.3% | +3.5% |
| YTD | +91.5% | +186.4% | -94.9% | +47.4% |
| 1Y | +214.8% | +229.1% | -14.3% | +116.8% |
| All | +214.8% | +227.6% | -12.8% | +116.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling