+145.5%
TER vs PCG
-20.0%
+165.5%
-58.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.2% | -1.3% | -14.0% | -15.1% |
| 7D | -28.2% | 0.0% | -28.2% | -28.2% |
| 30D | -50.6% | +5.8% | -56.4% | -50.9% |
| 3M | -45.3% | -22.8% | -22.6% | -43.6% |
| 6M | -40.4% | -18.4% | -22.0% | -39.3% |
| YTD | +10.0% | -16.9% | +26.9% | +12.0% |
| 1Y | +13.6% | -17.6% | +31.2% | +15.9% |
| All | +145.5% | -20.0% | +165.5% | +138.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling