+191.2%
TER vs NIO
-60.1%
+251.3%
-58.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -4.9% | -0.5% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +14.4% | -14.5% | +28.8% | +17.5% |
| 30D | -30.6% | -15.0% | -15.6% | -28.6% |
| 3M | -39.2% | -35.6% | -3.6% | -34.5% |
| 6M | -31.3% | -55.7% | +24.4% | -21.5% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -43.1% | +72.2% | +40.5% |
| 1Y | +47.4% | -53.5% | +101.0% | +65.2% |
| 3Y | +191.2% | -59.8% | +251.1% | +214.3% |
| All | +191.2% | -60.1% | +251.3% | +214.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling