+43.2%
TER vs NIO
-54.1%
+97.3%
-48.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.8% | +3.4% | -10.3% | -7.7% |
| 7D | -19.9% | -0.6% | -19.3% | -19.7% |
| 30D | -43.5% | -3.5% | -40.0% | -43.0% |
| 3M | -37.8% | -30.7% | -7.1% | -31.9% |
| 6M | -25.6% | -45.6% | +20.1% | -13.3% |
| YTD | +29.8% | -35.3% | +65.1% | +40.8% |
| 1Y | +43.2% | -53.9% | +97.1% | +94.2% |
| All | +43.2% | -54.1% | +97.3% | +94.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling