+238.5%
TER vs FLUT
-44.8%
+283.3%
-58.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | -2.2% | +7.7% | +5.8% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -1.6% | +2.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -8.3% | +7.7% | -16.0% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -12.2% | -0.7% | -11.5% | -13.6% |
| 6M | +17.1% | -11.2% | +28.2% | +18.1% |
| YTD | +84.7% | -53.4% | +138.1% | +123.9% |
| 1Y | +199.9% | -65.8% | +265.7% | +299.5% |
| All | +238.5% | -44.8% | +283.3% | +269.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling