+202.8%
TER vs ECHO
+242.1%
-39.2%
-59.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | 0.0% | +5.5% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +3.4% | -2.8% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -8.3% | +2.4% | -10.6% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -12.2% | -28.0% | +15.7% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +17.1% | -21.2% | +38.3% | +20.9% |
| YTD | +84.7% | -17.4% | +102.1% | +88.9% |
| 1Y | +199.9% | +33.6% | +166.3% | +186.2% |
| 3Y | +232.8% | +419.7% | -186.9% | +131.5% |
| All | +202.8% | +242.1% | -39.2% | +127.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling