+292.2%
TER vs EBAY
+148.9%
+143.2%
-58.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -1.0% | +4.2% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +12.4% | -3.0% | +15.3% | +12.9% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -3.6% | +8.7% | +5.6% |
| 3M | +4.0% | -4.4% | +8.4% | +4.2% |
| 6M | +29.5% | +12.1% | +17.5% | +23.9% |
| YTD | +98.5% | +19.9% | +78.5% | +86.2% |
| 1Y | +234.1% | +13.4% | +220.7% | +214.1% |
| All | +292.2% | +148.9% | +143.2% | +149.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling