+60.5%
TEM vs NOC
+26.7%
+33.9%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -2.5% | +2.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -5.2% | +6.1% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +38.4% | -7.2% | +45.6% | +39.6% |
| 3M | +23.7% | -5.1% | +28.8% | +23.7% |
| 6M | +26.0% | -31.1% | +57.1% | +38.0% |
| YTD | +9.4% | -8.6% | +18.0% | +11.0% |
| 1Y | -17.3% | -9.7% | -7.6% | -15.6% |
| All | +60.5% | +26.7% | +33.9% | +60.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling