+60.5%
TEM vs FROG
+158.2%
-97.6%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -3.3% | +3.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -11.3% | +12.2% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +38.4% | +3.6% | +34.7% | +36.1% |
| 3M | +23.7% | +1.7% | +22.0% | +22.0% |
| 6M | +26.0% | +123.5% | -97.5% | -8.0% |
| YTD | +9.4% | +40.2% | -30.8% | -6.5% |
| 1Y | -17.3% | +81.0% | -98.3% | -39.1% |
| All | +60.5% | +158.2% | -97.6% | -15.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling