+77.9%
TEM vs ENPH
-79.9%
+157.7%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.7% | -2.7% | -3.0% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -5.9% | -8.4% | +2.6% | -4.0% |
| 30D | +4.8% | -11.2% | +16.0% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +31.9% | -36.1% | +68.0% | +44.0% |
| 6M | +56.0% | -37.9% | +93.9% | +67.7% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -18.7% | +39.9% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +5.4% | -9.8% | +15.2% | +0.3% |
| All | +77.9% | -79.9% | +157.7% | +163.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling