+79.2%
TEAM vs PCG
-19.4%
+98.6%
-35.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.0% | +0.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -16.9% | -2.0% | -14.9% | -17.1% |
| 30D | -26.8% | -2.7% | -24.1% | -26.9% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -25.1% | +23.2% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +79.2% | -22.3% | +101.5% | +81.6% |
| All | +79.2% | -19.4% | +98.6% | +81.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling