-55.2%
TE vs NIO
-41.8%
-13.5%
-82.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +5.9% | -2.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -12.6% | +5.6% | -18.2% | -15.1% |
| 30D | -36.7% | -4.2% | -32.5% | -35.0% |
| 3M | -57.5% | -26.3% | -31.2% | -50.6% |
| 6M | -55.2% | -42.5% | -12.7% | -43.0% |
| All | -55.2% | -41.8% | -13.5% | -43.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling