+124.7%
TD vs UMAC
+549.5%
-424.8%
-19.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +9.3% | -10.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +14.7% | -13.8% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +6.3% | +0.5% | +5.8% | +5.9% |
| 6M | +27.9% | +57.9% | -30.0% | +25.9% |
| YTD | +29.8% | +103.9% | -74.1% | +27.1% |
| 1Y | +63.7% | +159.3% | -95.6% | +59.4% |
| All | +124.7% | +549.5% | -424.8% | +112.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling