+105.9%
T vs ZETA
+280.9%
-175.0%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -4.1% | +2.1% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +2.7% | -3.9% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +11.4% | +15.8% | -4.4% | +11.5% |
| 3M | +14.3% | +35.4% | -21.1% | +14.5% |
| 6M | -9.3% | +67.1% | -76.4% | -8.8% |
| YTD | +7.1% | +54.1% | -47.0% | +7.8% |
| 1Y | -9.1% | +67.8% | -76.9% | -8.6% |
| All | +105.9% | +280.9% | -175.0% | +92.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling