+108.2%
T vs XLC
+72.7%
+35.5%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.5% | +0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +0.6% | -2.1% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +7.6% | +0.2% | +7.4% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +15.3% | +0.6% | +14.7% | +15.1% |
| 6M | -8.5% | -4.5% | -4.0% | -7.6% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -4.7% | +11.5% | +7.8% |
| 1Y | -7.2% | -1.7% | -5.6% | -6.9% |
| 3Y | +108.2% | +72.3% | +36.0% | +79.8% |
| All | +108.2% | +72.7% | +35.5% | +79.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling