+65.5%
T vs PCG
-21.0%
+86.5%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.0% | +0.6% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -2.0% | +3.6% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -2.7% | -0.2% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -7.5% | -25.1% | +17.6% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -9.9% | -22.3% | +12.4% | -6.9% |
| YTD | -6.4% | -18.5% | +12.0% | -4.5% |
| 1Y | -9.4% | -21.8% | +12.4% | -6.9% |
| All | +65.5% | -21.0% | +86.5% | +72.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling