+65.5%
T vs NIO
-58.0%
+123.5%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -5.9% | +5.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -4.7% | +6.3% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -14.3% | +11.4% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -7.5% | -32.8% | +25.3% | -7.6% |
| 6M | -9.9% | -49.8% | +39.9% | -10.0% |
| YTD | -6.4% | -40.2% | +33.7% | -6.5% |
| 1Y | -9.4% | -52.7% | +43.3% | -9.5% |
| All | +65.5% | -58.0% | +123.5% | +65.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling