+102.9%
T vs MDLZ
-2.9%
+105.8%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.3% | -3.0% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -3.1% | 0.0% | -3.0% | -3.1% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +1.4% | +3.1% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +12.2% | 0.0% | +12.2% | +12.0% |
| 6M | -6.5% | +9.1% | -15.6% | -9.0% |
| YTD | +4.9% | +17.9% | -13.0% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | -10.5% | +3.2% | -13.7% | -11.8% |
| All | +102.9% | -2.9% | +105.8% | +97.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling