+61.0%
T vs LDOS
+35.4%
+25.7%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.1% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -3.7% | +8.0% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +16.4% | -26.1% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -4.3% | +7.4% | -11.7% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -0.3% | -13.3% | -14.2% |
| YTD | -8.0% | -24.0% | +16.1% | -9.2% |
| 1Y | -6.9% | -29.6% | +22.7% | -7.9% |
| All | +61.0% | +35.4% | +25.7% | +61.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling