+92.1%
T vs GLDM
+248.1%
-156.0%
-39.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.9% | -1.1% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.5% | -0.7% | -1.3% |
| 30D | +11.4% | +4.4% | +7.0% | +11.3% |
| 3M | +14.3% | -1.1% | +15.4% | +14.4% |
| 6M | -9.3% | -13.7% | +4.4% | -8.9% |
| YTD | +7.1% | +2.8% | +4.3% | +6.4% |
| 1Y | -9.1% | +24.8% | -33.9% | -10.8% |
| 3Y | +105.3% | +127.8% | -22.5% | +92.2% |
| 5Y | +66.8% | +141.1% | -74.3% | +54.9% |
| All | +92.1% | +248.1% | -156.0% | +96.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling