-23.5%
SWKS vs UMAC
+494.0%
-517.5%
-58.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -3.1% | +6.6% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +12.5% | -0.9% | +13.4% | +12.5% |
| 30D | +10.5% | -7.7% | +18.2% | +10.6% |
| 3M | -7.4% | -26.4% | +19.0% | -7.0% |
| 6M | +32.7% | +61.9% | -29.2% | +29.1% |
| YTD | +19.2% | +86.5% | -67.3% | +15.1% |
| 1Y | +2.4% | +156.3% | -153.9% | -2.2% |
| All | -23.5% | +494.0% | -517.5% | -26.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling