-2.0%
STZ vs NIO
-47.2%
+45.2%
-25.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -3.0% | +2.4% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +11.8% | -3.6% | +15.4% | +10.9% |
| 30D | +26.0% | -8.0% | +34.0% | +23.9% |
| 3M | +11.5% | -31.2% | +42.7% | +3.3% |
| 6M | -2.0% | -45.8% | +43.8% | -13.4% |
| All | -2.0% | -47.2% | +45.2% | -13.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling