-5.3%
STZ vs CLBK
+27.2%
-32.5%
-25.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.0% | -2.8% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +0.6% | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +20.9% | +2.9% | +18.0% | +19.8% |
| 3M | +8.0% | +3.0% | +5.0% | +6.4% |
| 6M | -5.3% | +27.3% | -32.6% | -16.8% |
| All | -5.3% | +27.2% | -32.5% | -16.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling