-35.4%
STZ vs ACGL
+35.7%
-71.1%
-56.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +2.7% | +2.6% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +13.0% | +8.0% | +5.0% | +10.6% |
| 30D | +29.4% | +17.3% | +12.1% | +24.0% |
| 3M | +11.6% | +11.2% | +0.4% | +8.4% |
| 6M | -0.2% | +18.2% | -18.4% | -4.6% |
| YTD | +8.6% | +15.4% | -6.8% | +4.3% |
| 1Y | +15.9% | +26.5% | -10.6% | +9.1% |
| All | -35.4% | +35.7% | -71.1% | -38.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling