+207.3%
STT vs NIO
-62.6%
+270.0%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -13.0% | +13.5% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +3.9% | -18.3% | +22.1% | +5.2% |
| 3M | +20.0% | -33.2% | +53.2% | +23.1% |
| 6M | +55.3% | -21.5% | +76.8% | +56.8% |
| YTD | +53.3% | -25.5% | +78.8% | +55.2% |
| 1Y | +74.7% | -38.0% | +112.7% | +78.8% |
| All | +207.3% | -62.6% | +270.0% | +217.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling