+168.1%
STT vs NIO
-59.9%
+228.0%
-25.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +5.9% | -5.7% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | +5.6% | -8.1% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -5.0% | -4.2% | -0.7% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -10.5% | -26.3% | +15.8% | -8.8% |
| 6M | +10.0% | -42.5% | +52.6% | +13.6% |
| YTD | +30.7% | -33.5% | +64.2% | +33.0% |
| 1Y | +43.8% | -52.7% | +96.4% | +49.7% |
| 3Y | +168.1% | -57.5% | +225.5% | +173.6% |
| All | +168.1% | -59.9% | +228.0% | +173.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling