+21.7%
STM vs ZETA
+280.9%
-259.3%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -4.1% | +5.9% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +5.8% | +2.7% | +3.1% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -1.0% | +15.8% | -16.8% | -3.5% |
| 3M | -33.3% | +35.4% | -68.7% | -36.8% |
| 6M | +57.4% | +67.1% | -9.8% | +42.4% |
| YTD | +102.2% | +54.1% | +48.1% | +84.6% |
| 1Y | +99.6% | +67.8% | +31.8% | +78.1% |
| All | +21.7% | +280.9% | -259.3% | -21.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling