+19.4%
STM vs UMAC
+494.0%
-474.6%
-62.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -3.1% | +4.9% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +5.8% | -0.9% | +6.7% | +5.8% |
| 30D | -1.0% | -7.7% | +6.7% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -33.3% | -26.4% | -6.8% | -32.8% |
| 6M | +57.4% | +61.9% | -4.5% | +51.1% |
| YTD | +102.2% | +86.5% | +15.7% | +92.0% |
| 1Y | +99.6% | +156.3% | -56.7% | +85.9% |
| All | +19.4% | +494.0% | -474.6% | +7.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling