+98.3%
STM vs ECHO
+45.5%
+52.8%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +1.9% | -1.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +12.0% | +5.7% | +6.3% | +9.5% |
| 30D | -0.4% | +13.8% | -14.2% | -4.6% |
| 3M | -13.2% | +9.1% | -22.3% | -15.6% |
| 6M | -26.1% | -24.9% | -1.1% | -22.4% |
| YTD | +81.2% | -8.0% | +89.2% | +81.4% |
| 1Y | +98.3% | +42.9% | +55.4% | +87.2% |
| All | +98.3% | +45.5% | +52.8% | +87.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling