+19.6%
STM vs CLSK
+202.5%
-182.9%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.5% | +0.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +17.2% | -15.6% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +14.6% | -19.7% | -7.5% |
| 3M | -29.6% | -16.8% | -12.8% | -28.4% |
| 6M | +54.4% | +38.2% | +16.2% | +45.7% |
| YTD | +99.5% | +31.2% | +68.3% | +87.4% |
| 1Y | +100.8% | +37.3% | +63.4% | +82.6% |
| All | +19.6% | +202.5% | -182.9% | -9.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling