+117.9%
STLD vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+217.9%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +2.6% | -0.5% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -9.7% | +9.1% | -18.7% | -9.7% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -37.1% | +32.6% | -4.3% |
| 3M | -13.1% | -53.7% | +40.6% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -2.8% | -99.7% | +96.9% | -2.8% |
| YTD | +35.3% | -99.9% | +135.2% | +35.1% |
| 1Y | +51.4% | -99.9% | +151.3% | +51.1% |
| 3Y | +117.9% | -100.0% | +217.9% | +120.0% |
| All | +117.9% | -100.0% | +217.9% | +120.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling