+50.0%
STLD vs UMAC
+8.8%
+41.2%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -4.6% | +1.4% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -5.2% | +8.1% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -5.6% | -36.4% | +30.8% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -11.7% | -58.6% | +46.9% | -8.8% |
| 6M | -2.8% | -24.6% | +21.9% | -3.0% |
| YTD | +36.4% | -11.5% | +47.9% | +32.2% |
| 1Y | +50.0% | +16.9% | +33.1% | +43.6% |
| All | +50.0% | +8.8% | +41.2% | +43.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling