+106.6%
STLD vs NIO
-62.1%
+168.7%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.6% | -3.0% | -4.6% | -7.3% |
| 7D | -12.5% | -3.6% | -8.9% | -12.2% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -8.0% | +1.2% | -6.2% |
| 3M | -16.4% | -31.2% | +14.8% | -13.8% |
| 6M | -6.1% | -45.8% | +39.6% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +32.0% | -37.3% | +69.2% | +36.2% |
| 1Y | +45.5% | -56.1% | +101.6% | +54.7% |
| All | +106.6% | -62.1% | +168.7% | +114.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling