+60.1%
STLD vs NIO
-54.1%
+114.2%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +3.4% | -6.5% | -3.3% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -0.6% | -3.3% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -3.5% | +3.1% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -9.2% | -30.7% | +21.5% | -6.9% |
| 6M | +5.0% | -45.6% | +50.6% | +9.5% |
| YTD | +42.8% | -35.3% | +78.1% | +47.0% |
| 1Y | +60.1% | -53.9% | +114.0% | +80.4% |
| All | +60.1% | -54.1% | +114.2% | +80.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling