-75.7%
STLA vs ARMK
+96.1%
-171.8%
-83.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -0.8% | -2.7% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -11.6% | +2.8% | -14.4% | -12.7% |
| 30D | -6.2% | -1.8% | -4.4% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -24.6% | -10.9% | -13.7% | -20.9% |
| 6M | -44.9% | +21.2% | -66.1% | -50.7% |
| YTD | -62.3% | +47.0% | -109.3% | -69.5% |
| 1Y | -61.8% | +42.9% | -104.7% | -68.7% |
| All | -75.7% | +96.1% | -171.8% | -82.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling