-89.0%
SQQQ vs STZ
-49.0%
-40.0%
-92.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +1.9% | +1.4% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -4.1% | +8.2% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -7.6% | +12.2% | +2.7% |
| 3M | -10.4% | -12.3% | +1.9% | -13.2% |
| 6M | -42.1% | -16.3% | -25.8% | -44.6% |
| YTD | -40.3% | -8.4% | -32.0% | -40.3% |
| 1Y | -50.2% | -10.8% | -39.4% | -50.6% |
| All | -89.0% | -49.0% | -40.0% | -90.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling