-89.3%
SQQQ vs COST
+70.3%
-159.6%
-92.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +0.3% | -2.8% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -1.2% | +3.0% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +4.2% | -4.7% | +8.9% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -3.3% | -7.1% | +3.8% | -11.0% |
| 6M | -43.6% | -8.5% | -35.1% | -49.2% |
| YTD | -41.9% | +5.4% | -47.3% | -36.8% |
| 1Y | -50.6% | -5.6% | -45.0% | -54.4% |
| 3Y | -89.3% | +68.5% | -157.8% | -71.9% |
| All | -89.3% | +70.3% | -159.6% | -71.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling