+480.5%
SPXL vs NIO
-36.7%
+517.2%
-76.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -1.6% | +0.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -13.0% | +13.1% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -18.3% | +17.4% | +3.2% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -33.2% | +35.2% | +10.6% |
| 6M | +33.5% | -21.5% | +55.0% | +38.6% |
| YTD | +32.2% | -25.5% | +57.6% | +38.3% |
| 1Y | +48.9% | -38.0% | +86.9% | +60.5% |
| 3Y | +222.9% | -65.5% | +288.3% | +261.9% |
| 5Y | +140.7% | -90.6% | +231.3% | +220.6% |
| All | +480.5% | -36.7% | +517.2% | +424.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling