+227.2%
SPXL vs HTZ
-86.4%
+313.7%
-48.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +1.3% | -2.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +7.5% | -7.4% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +47.4% | -48.3% | -5.5% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -54.9% | +56.9% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +33.5% | -47.0% | +80.5% | +37.9% |
| YTD | +32.2% | -55.3% | +87.4% | +38.6% |
| 1Y | +48.9% | -57.6% | +106.5% | +55.2% |
| All | +227.2% | -86.4% | +313.7% | +344.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling