+160.6%
SPMO vs CFG
+182.2%
-21.6%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.6% | +3.3% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -4.5% | +5.6% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +2.0% | +6.3% | -4.3% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +20.6% | +5.9% | +19.0% |
| YTD | +26.5% | +21.2% | +5.3% | +18.5% |
| 1Y | +27.9% | +38.2% | -10.3% | +14.8% |
| All | +160.6% | +182.2% | -21.6% | +96.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling