+109.7%
SPG vs MTB
+116.9%
-7.1%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.1% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +1.7% | -4.1% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -4.2% | -2.6% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +2.7% | +8.9% | -6.2% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +5.5% | +10.9% | -5.4% | +0.8% |
| YTD | +15.7% | +21.5% | -5.8% | +6.1% |
| 1Y | +20.9% | +21.9% | -1.0% | +10.5% |
| All | +109.7% | +116.9% | -7.1% | +45.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling