+154.9%
SOXX vs UMAC
+473.8%
-318.8%
-41.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -2.5% | +4.3% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -3.4% | +4.8% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -3.6% | -15.1% | +11.5% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -10.8% | +0.6% | -10.4% |
| 6M | +54.2% | +15.7% | +38.6% | +49.9% |
| YTD | +75.2% | +80.1% | -4.9% | +66.2% |
| 1Y | +107.5% | +116.7% | -9.2% | +94.3% |
| All | +154.9% | +473.8% | -318.8% | +135.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling