-100.0%
SOXS vs UMC
+143.5%
-243.5%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +2.4% | -7.9% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +9.0% | -13.8% | +13.1% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +17.2% | -9.5% | +47.5% |
| 3M | -10.2% | +11.4% | -21.6% | +55.6% |
| 6M | -99.2% | +137.5% | -236.7% | -66.5% |
| YTD | -99.5% | +193.1% | -292.6% | -68.7% |
| 1Y | -99.8% | +240.3% | -340.1% | -76.3% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | +262.2% | -362.2% | -96.0% |
| All | -100.0% | +143.5% | -243.5% | -99.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling