-100.0%
SOXS vs LCID
-92.8%
-7.2%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -7.8% | +5.9% | -4.8% |
| 7D | -16.6% | -9.3% | -7.2% | -19.5% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -35.4% | +31.0% | -17.6% |
| 3M | -26.2% | -17.1% | -9.1% | -26.5% |
| 6M | -99.3% | -58.9% | -40.3% | -99.3% |
| YTD | -99.5% | -59.6% | -39.9% | -99.6% |
| 1Y | -99.8% | -78.0% | -21.8% | -99.8% |
| All | -100.0% | -92.8% | -7.2% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling